HP hp workstation xw6200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP hp workstation xw6200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B8h
Memory5.5 GB free of 8.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20051222
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 11 '17 at 12:55
Run Duration787 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.00GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 50.9
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 47
28% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 47.9
8-Core 46.4
6% 47.2 Pts
64-Core 47.8
3% 47.8 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
XFX(1682 6000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.59 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 7B300R0 300GB
182GB free
Firmware: BAH41BM0 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
Read 50.6
Write 54
Mixed 44.2
37% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 3.85
4K Mixed 0.21
117% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 30%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ADA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 52.4
Mixed 25.8
32% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.32
73% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 42%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 24.3
Write 21.3
Mixed 6.38
20% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 2.67
4K Mixed 0.44
110% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 52%
aigo storage 500GB
70GB free, PID 6781
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.3% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 21.8
Mixed 9.03
22% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 18%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB
7GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.92
Write 1.05
1% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 12%
StoreJet TS256GESD400K 256GB
7GB free, PID 07d1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 25.8
Write 22.4
Mixed 21.4
29% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.92
4K Write 6.04
4K Mixed 1.36
274% 4.44 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 146%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33280 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.6% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.6
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 3
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw6200 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw6200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback