To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime23.2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 22:35
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 191
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 509
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Poor
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 139
Parallax 213
0% 117 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 125
Splatting 90.6
88% 109 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 30%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
464GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 227 224 224 225 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.2% Very good
Read 234
Write 219
Mixed 218
SusWrite 225
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 39.8
125% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 52 66 74 90 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 109
Write 99
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 69.9
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
466GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 127 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 131
Write 122
Mixed 61
SusWrite 126
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 88%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
3GB free, PID 007a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 4.6 4.8 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.7
7% 6.48 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1 Samsung M378B5273DH0- CT102464BA160 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.6% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 29.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback