Asus B85M-G R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150625
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '17 at 05:52
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 173 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 256 34% 257 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% AMD(1002 2543) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.2 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 13.1 12% 13.2 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 12.6 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 128GB-$66 2,808 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: JTRA0102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 22058 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 795 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 189 189 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 181 (C2) HDA temperature 69 58 180389806111 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	94.8% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 460 Mixed 493 108% 483 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 37.8 110% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 91.6 116% 205 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 187 183 5633 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 51 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9000 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 29 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 15 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 41984 (C2) HDA temperature 118 114 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 4	58.2% Above average	Read 98.6 Write 104 Mixed 93.2 74% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.25 66% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 67%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 12GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 134 130 6300 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9640 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 43 43 41629 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1567 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 57 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9640 (C2) HDA temperature 111 96 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	24.2% Poor	Read 44.1 Write 39.8 Mixed 43.4 32% 42.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.34 93% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x4GB 5,041 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.2% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G R2.0 Builds (Compare 801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G R2.0

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	154x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	132x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	91x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	83x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	48x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	34x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	32x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	33x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	18x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16