HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	9.5 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '21 at 12:29
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 93.3 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 91.5 52% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 91.7 8-Core 92 12% 91.8 Pts	64-Core 91.9 6% 91.9 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3657) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 19.2 Reflection 23.7 Parallax 25.9 16% 22.9 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 24.5 Splatting 21 20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 72 73 70 74 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 79.5 Write 61.3 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 71.9 44% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 74%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB 8,287 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 18GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 54 55 56 56 47 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 57.5 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 53.1 38% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 36GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 51 54 53 53 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 52.3 Write 53.2 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 51.9 64% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 44%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 914GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 56 57 59 60 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 47.8 Write 70.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 56.1 78% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.4 166% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 56%
Mass Storage Device 640GB 432 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 90GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 16.5 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 18.9 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 19%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB 4,635 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 957GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 20 19 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 22.2 Mixed 20 SusWrite 19.1 30% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 43%
WD 312CS External 500GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 386GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 20 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 31 Write 26.3 Mixed 22 SusWrite 19.1 32% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:02 9E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:02 9E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 48GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.4% Below average	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 11.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 10.9 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	389x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	73x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	61x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	17x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16