Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3220-$36 19,337 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	39% Below average	Memory 56 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 131 50% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 129 8-Core 129 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% BFG(19F1 0E79) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	4.93% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 9.2 Parallax 2.3 5% 6 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 3.4 4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.93% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB7S512G1122 512GB 1,543 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3540000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 225 219 244 162 174 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 375 Write 313 Mixed 265 SusWrite 208 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 22.6 93% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 125 138% 236 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 10.9 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	42x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	37x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	16x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	15x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5773QB0-CK0 6GBSamsungBench 44%, 137 samples	12x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	11x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $203

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16