Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '21 at 00:46
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 232
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 627
63% 511 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.6% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 57.9
48% 60.8 fps
MRender 43
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 50.2
40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SA2000M 250GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 996 883 575 272 273 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 900
Write 972
Mixed 820
SusWrite 545
182% 809 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 57
183% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 276
252% 406 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 147%
Great: 229%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 240GB
100GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 184 107 89 91 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 296
Write 271
Mixed 227
SusWrite 126
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 1.6
43% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 78.8
65% 94.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
885GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 131 130 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 87.2
Write 126
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 129
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback