| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-CS/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20141212 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 18 '17 at 13:09 |
| Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.9%
Very good
|
80% 139 Pts
|
39% 291 Pts
|
18% 292 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 361.43
|
20%
Very poor
|
21% 22.6 fps
|
18% 22.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
65% 297 MB/s
|
158% 66.1 MB/s
|
58% 105 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C11 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
33.7%
Below average
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
31% 10.7 GB/s
|
66% 60.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 190 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-CS/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 42x |
| Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 35x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 24x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 18x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $102 |