PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150427 |
Uptime | 28.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 13 '21 at 02:17 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 105 107 96 90 85 MB/s
|
72.5%
Very good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
161GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 81 80 80 MB/s
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
21%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 16x |
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 16x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 12x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 12x |
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $126 |