Asus X99-A II

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A II (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 01:03
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	53%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	45% Average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 48.1 48% 67.4 Pts	4-Core 83.8 8-Core 108 12% 96.1 Pts	64-Core 105 6% 105 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 C732) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 96.7 Parallax 120 96% 112 fps	MRender 169 Gravity 120 Splatting 98 102% 129 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 4T00 4TB 1,397 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 3TB free (System drive) Firmware: 411040RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 139 319 320 359 364 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 378 Write 382 Mixed 310 SusWrite 274 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 28.6 92% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 233 204% 306 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 115%
Walgreen Infinitive 32GB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 29GB free, PID 55a7 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 5.9 16 10 9.6 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 25.9 Write 19.8 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 10 24% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2 148% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 3x8GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3 of 8 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	40.8% Average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 12.1 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	60	31.5"	1280 720	AUS32B2 ASUS XG32VQR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	698x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	195x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	190x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	216x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	181x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	108x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	63x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	41x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	29x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $686

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16