Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 11:05
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 109
54% 85 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 381
37% 306 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 63.2
54% 66.5 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 55.7
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-512M6S+ 512GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 251 237 290 231 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 333
Write 274
Mixed 226
SusWrite 234
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 25.7
92% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 63.3
DQ Mixed 31.1
28% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58%
Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
47GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 305 269 228 207 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 399
Write 382
Mixed 300
SusWrite 234
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 42.5
138% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 39.6
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 53.7
45% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.7% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 APP9226 LED Cinema
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback