PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Jingsha Default string (all builds) |
Motherboard | JINGSHA Default string |
Memory | 57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20200914 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 17 '21 at 14:51 |
Run Duration | 208 Seconds |
Run User | CHL-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
63.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 265 267 263 267 266 MB/s
|
88.2%
Excellent
|
|||
67.7%
Good
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 117 115 116 MB/s
|
64.7%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
459GB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 MB/s
|
||||
54%
Above average
|
||||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB
35GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.1 4 2.5 2.9 MB/s
|
||||
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 1TB
155GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v31stBench 67%, 867 samples | 12x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 4x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v31stBench 70%, 417 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $130 |