Toshiba Satellite L655

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite L655 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111109
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '21 at 16:43
Run Duration	327 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 640 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 139 56% 95 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 185 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M 12,937 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FD12) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	3.32% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 5.2 Parallax 3.5 3% 4.27 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 4.2 3% 4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.32% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 210 160 36 27 19 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.4% Average	Read 240 Write 228 Mixed 215 SusWrite 110 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 21.2 70% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 165 110% 131 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 126%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 80GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 71 71 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 73.3 Write 74.2 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 68.9 48% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 62%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 15GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 54 57 58 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 47.8 Write 61.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 56.3 40% 53.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.8 204% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 71%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35 11,469 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 392GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.82% Terrible	Read 6 Write 16.7 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 3.4 8% 11 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 2.82% Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 274GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.06% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 19.2 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 4 12% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 8.06% Great: 61%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 336GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.91% Terrible	Read 24 Write 18.5 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 3.3 12% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.91% Great: 61%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 425GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.13% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 18 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 3.4 12% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 8.13% Great: 42%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70 21,848 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 284GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.24% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 18.8 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 3.5 12% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 466GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.19% Terrible	Read 25 Write 19.7 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 3.4 12% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 8.19% Great: 62%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 30GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	4.64% Terrible	Read 20.3 Write 4.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.5 10% 9.25 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1 42% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.64% Great: 33%
WDC WD25 00BEKT-75PVM 250GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 152GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.03% Terrible	Read 22.2 Write 16.2 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 6.4 20% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.03% Great: 16%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 633 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 519GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 17.8 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 6.4 21% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.2% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.1 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMO1680

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite L655 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L655

CPU
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	52x
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	29x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	27x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	70x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	64x
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	44x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	13x
TSB1066D3S7ELF/2G 2x2GBUnknownBench 23%, 243 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16