HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FC
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210818
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '21 at 20:32
Run Duration	323 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 150 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 478 45% 373 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 85FC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9686 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.57% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 64.6 Parallax 8.4 5% 26.4 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.57% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv128g TOSHIBA 128GB 3,266 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 273 273 245 107 42 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 524 Write 432 Mixed 340 SusWrite 192 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 37.1 133% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 254 186% 250 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 135%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 644GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 64GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0 0.2 0.1 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 91 Write 88.2 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 2.1 43% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 210GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 119 125 126 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 132 Write 136 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 122 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.6 191% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 11GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 5GB free Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 100 Write 94.5 Mixed 49.2 60% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 11GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 7GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.6 0 0.2 0.1 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 101 Write 96.2 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 2.1 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 107GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 95GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.6 0 0.2 0.2 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 95.7 Write 85.4 Mixed 52.9 SusWrite 1.4 44% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB 5,568 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 190GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 86 84 84 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 90.4 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 85 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 90%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 665GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 0.9 1 0.1 0.2 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 0.7 52% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 11GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 8GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.6 0 0.2 0.1 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 114 Write 114 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 2.1 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 319GB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 164GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 83 84 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 99.8 Write 44.5 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 86.1 52% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	76% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 22.8 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 19.3 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 50: 10R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
50%	21%	48	230	129	60	15.5"	1920 1080	BOE0852

History: Score 31: 3R 3G 7B | Score 50: 10R 0G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx Builds (Compare 5,186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk0xxx

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	3,204x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,366x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	615x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,608x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,506x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	497x

SSD
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples	424x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	414x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	278x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	717x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	431x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	399x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16