| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130410 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 09 '21 at 03:53 |
| Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.6%
Above average
|
52% 84.8 Pts
|
31% 251 Pts
|
18% 299 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 8698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
82.1%
Excellent
|
84% 97.7 fps
|
79% 98.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 335 Series 240GB-$219
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 335s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 145 156 165 158 151 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
49% 221 MB/s
|
80% 26.4 MB/s
|
168% 224 MB/s
|
|
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
146GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 87 87 89 89 MB/s
|
51.4%
Above average
|
59% 80.7 MB/s
|
183% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
|
55.8%
Above average
|
72% 97.5 MB/s
|
126% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0637
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 29 29 28 MB/s
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
20% 26.8 MB/s
|
147% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.8%
Below average
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
45% 88.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $516 |