Supermicro X10SLM-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Supermicro X10SLM-F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X10SLM-F
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '21 at 16:43
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$25 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 218 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 550 59% 469 Pts	64-Core 564 35% 564 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44% Average	Lighting 57 Reflection 58.9 Parallax 50.2 46% 55.4 fps	MRender 42.8 Gravity 53.3 Splatting 47.5 39% 47.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MR9260-4i 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 102 93 101 101 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.6% Below average	Read 31.4 Write 107 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 99.2 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 M391B1G73QH0-YK0 Winbond 25X/Q Series 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600, 0 MHz 8192, 8192, 16 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.7% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 8.7 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 10 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 80.8 50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X10SLM-F Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

System: Supermicro X10SLM-F

CPU
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $104Bench 69%, 5,273 samples	5x
Xeon E3-1231 v3Intel $25Bench 73%, 19,313 samples	2x
Xeon E3-1230 v3Intel $217Bench 73%, 8,137 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
Extreme Pro 480GBSanDisk $199Bench 93%, 9,250 samples	1x

RAM
9965525-055.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 50 samples	2x
M391B1G73QH0-YK0 M391B1G73QH0-YK0 Winbond 25X/Q Series 16GBSamsungBench 42%, 2 samples	2x
9965525-138.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 58%, 225 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $639

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16