Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$248 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 95.3 2-Core 183 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 302 40% 301 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D 8084) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.67% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.4 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 3.1 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tammuz SSD 120GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 176 196 193 200 197 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 334 Write 195 Mixed 178 SusWrite 189 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 8.4 54% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 23.2 DQ Write 72.8 DQ Mixed 9.8 18% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GB 7,467 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.1 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	196x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	28x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	14x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	17x
SH564128FH8N0TNSDG 1x4GBSmartBench 31%, 175 samples	9x
KVT8FP-HYC 2x4GBKingstonBench 55%, 733 samples	7x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16