Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 163 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 388 41% 327 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 3700) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.17% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 2.7 3% 5.83 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 89 90 89 92 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 158 Write 129 Mixed 146 SusWrite 92.4 30% 131 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 22.5 89% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 122 97% 134 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.4% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 11.1 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	7x
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBCorsairBench 29%, 626 samples	2x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 52%, 470 samples	2x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $402

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16