Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5750M APU 4,247 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 49.3 1-Core 39.3 2-Core 69 33% 52.5 Pts	4-Core 91.1 8-Core 120 13% 106 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Emtec X1 50 120GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: T112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 66 125 113 62 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 309 Write 285 Mixed 288 SusWrite 87.6 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 5.8 33% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 34.3 54% 104 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 74%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87 21,339 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 691GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 34 104 112 123 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 120 Write 115 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 84.3 71% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2S8G64CC8HB5N-DI PSD38G1600L2S 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.2% Poor	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 8.7 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 163 24% 163 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-5750M APUAMDBench 41%, 4,247 samples	27x
A10-4600M APUAMDBench 43%, 5,886 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 8650GAMDBench 5%, 4,043 samples	27x
Radeon HD 7660GAMDBench 4%, 4,227 samples	8x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 128GBToshibaBench 74%, 741 samples	6x
SSD 240GBGigabyte $32Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	4x
GOODRAM 240GBBench 79%, 8,481 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 47%, 143 samples	3x
M2S8G64CC8HB5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 29%, 1,618 samples	3x
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-DI M2S4G64CB8HG5N-DI 8GBNanyaBench 32%, 60 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16