Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 02:48
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 133
51% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 190
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
Asus(1043 3021) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 20.7
15% 22 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 18.3
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 229 32 40 155 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 484
Write 153
Mixed 118
SusWrite 112
47% 217 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 7.4
28% 8.63 MB/s
DQ Read 33.9
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 12.9
12% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 99%
Fujitsu MHW2160BH PL 160GB
57GB free
Firmware: 891F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 31 34 33 30 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 27.3
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 30.8
22% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19%
Great: 26%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
145GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 70.2
Mixed 46.6
44% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 50%
Generic USB SD Reader 16GB
14GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.2 4.4 4.3 3.9 4.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Read 4
Write 4.2
Mixed 4
SusWrite 4
6% 4.05 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.5
98% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 14GB
1600, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback