Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90 2,884 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 45 1-Core 36.2 2-Core 74.7 32% 52 Pts	4-Core 70.5 8-Core 73.2 10% 71.8 Pts	64-Core 73.4 4% 73.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA A235) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	1.48% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.83 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.48% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 167 170 193 186 197 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47% Average	Read 178 Write 186 Mixed 181 SusWrite 179 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 25.5 85% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 37.7 DQ Write 75.4 DQ Mixed 47.1 38% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 118%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 298GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 66 65 66 66 67 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 64 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 65.1 42% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9.4 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.9 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16