PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Dell Precision T5610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5610 (all builds) |
Memory | 28.8 GB free of 31.999 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20181114 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 10 '22 at 21:43 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
39%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 473.04
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
77.5%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
764GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 162 201 199 199 199 MB/s
|
69.7%
Good
|
|||
PNY CS2030 480GB SSD
447GB free
Firmware: CS203021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 474 620 643 639 644 MB/s
|
161%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi HUS724020ALA640 2TB
379GB free
Firmware: MF6ONS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 135 133 135 135 MB/s
|
69%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HUS724020ALA640 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: MF6ONS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 145 154 154 154 153 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT84GL7BMR4A-PB 1x31GB
1 of 8 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
23.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 66x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples | 48x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 79x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 38x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 25% - Poor | Total price: $94 |