Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 711 67% 554 Pts	64-Core 683 42% 683 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 91%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 1TB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 605 609 451 423 475 446 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 673 Write 1558 Mixed 1,228 SusWrite 501 226% 990 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 40.7 139% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,096 DQ Write 93.1 DQ Mixed 207 249% 465 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 240%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	88% Excellent	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 25 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 34.4 SC Mixed 24.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 68%

Battle cruiser

CPU
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	27x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	54x

SSD
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B3-BB1 1TBBench 189%, 243 samples	34x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	2x
WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TBWDCBench 101%, 5,778 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	47x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $67Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	1x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $457

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16