Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170802
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '17 at 23:41
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 9,821 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Memory 73.5 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 131 55% 91.2 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 213 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% PowerColor(148C 2015) 2GB CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.9.1 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 26 Reflection 28 Parallax 31 21% 28.3 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 20.8 Splatting 33 22% 26.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 468 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 397 (B1) Unknown 93 93 33 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 47 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 110 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8375070300	75.9% Very good	Read 472 Write 256 Mixed 273 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 25.1 112% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 63.7 78% 140 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 110%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 659GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 172 8175 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4384 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21210 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4192 (C0) Power-off retract count 105 105 71578 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 727242 (C2) HDA temperature 116 100 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	26.2% Poor	Read 51.3 Write 39.6 Mixed 49 35% 46.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB 313 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 30GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 30.6 Mixed 24.2 37% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 78.BAGHZ.AFL0C 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.8% Below average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 14.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 10 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	26x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	12x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	7x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 456 samples	3x
F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 197 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16