| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 7.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3128-A1 |
| Memory | 123.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130920 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 23 '22 at 10:19 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
71.9%
Very good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
57% 473 Pts
|
49% 795 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
|
7.55%
Terrible
|
7% 12 fps
|
9% 11.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IBM ServeRAID M5015 24TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 385 383 384 384 384 MB/s
|
126%
Outstanding
|
211% 939 MB/s
|
150% 45.2 MB/s
|
170% 230 MB/s
|
|
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 500GB-$122
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 100 94 94 124 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
90% 123 MB/s
|
274% 1.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
93.1%
Outstanding
|
106% 37 GB/s
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
52% 76.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 71x |
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 7x |
| Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 15x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 11x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |