Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 62.9 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 188 64% 116 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 556 53% 436 Pts	64-Core 577 36% 577 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Lighting 17.3 Reflection 20.4 Parallax 26.2 14% 21.3 fps	MRender 15.8 Gravity 19.5 Splatting 14.2 13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,094 Write 1,297 Mixed 1212 338% 1,534 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 52 169% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 423 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 365 269% 357 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 235GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 67 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 103 Write 99.3 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 66.3 62% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	68.7% Good	MC Read 25.9 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 23.1 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 21.9 68% 24 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	1x

GPU
R7 250XAMDBench 12%, 12,863 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GBSamsungBench 57%, 49 samples	1x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $135

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16