Oegstone Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemOegstone Q87M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime15.4 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 20:23
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 515
49% 403 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2657 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 190
Parallax 116
98% 142 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 129
Splatting 110
94% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1230C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 422
Write 382
Mixed 345
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 17.1
91% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 118
137% 234 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
45GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 107 95 96 101 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 256
Mixed 377
SusWrite 139
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 44.9
154% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 357
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90%
Great: 124%
SanDisk X110 mSATA 64GB-$111
32GB free
Firmware: 0509
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 36 37 37 34 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 333
Write 97
Mixed 120
SusWrite 37.8
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 18.6
68% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 89.1
DQ Mixed 87.6
71% 102 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 81%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86
272GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 102 98 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 159
Write 164
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 101
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
135GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 31
Write 98.8
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 87.9
45% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback