Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z170 OC Formula (all builds)
Memory	55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170110
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '22 at 09:54
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 195 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 423 44% 352 Pts	64-Core 698 43% 698 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28% Poor	Lighting 35.2 Reflection 39 Parallax 36.5 29% 36.9 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 37 Splatting 26.2 26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 218 222 127 147 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 425 Write 406 Mixed 292 SusWrite 194 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 45.8 152% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 326 252% 344 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 114%
Adata SX8100NP 512GB 9,167 User benchmarks, average bench 226% 85GB free Firmware: VB411D45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 185 61 255 252 216 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 224 Write 628 Mixed 1,045 SusWrite 233 122% 533 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 54.2 122% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 991 DQ Write 562 DQ Mixed 300 351% 618 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 320%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 183 183 183 183 182 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 130 Write 127 Mixed 30 SusWrite 182 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 4x16GB 245 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	67% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 21.1 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 22.5 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 129%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	5x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	5x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GBCorsair $74Bench 76%, 29,684 samples	4x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,248

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16