Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 135 57% 94.1 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 551 51% 426 Pts	64-Core 820 51% 820 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% Asus(1043 8813) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	143% Outstanding	Lighting 203 Reflection 208 Parallax 209 165% 207 fps	MRender 233 Gravity 142 Splatting 123 130% 166 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 13 12 24 41 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 54.8 Write 57.1 Mixed 38.6 SusWrite 27 33% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 34%
WD WD40EFZX-68AWUN0 4TB 1,814 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 25 24 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C 16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 33.4 99% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16