IBM System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]-

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	IBM System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]- (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM 00MV214
Memory	186.7 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140917
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '22 at 13:38
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 827 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 172 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 629 58% 483 Pts	64-Core 2,221 138% 2,221 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000 1,173 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.33 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	46% Average	Lighting 55.1 Reflection 61.8 Parallax 75.7 45% 64.2 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 61.4 Splatting 50.2 48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 2.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1010 842 793 300 926 1023 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	244% Outstanding	Read 2,962 Write 2,992 Mixed 1264 SusWrite 816 448% 2,009 MB/s	4K Read 79.8 4K Write 89.8 4K Mixed 43.3 224% 71 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 266 186% 235 MB/s
Poor: 227% ↑ This bench: 244% Great: 244%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 599GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 558GB free Firmware: 3.34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 126 111 140 124 121 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.1% Poor	Read 296 Write 130 Mixed 104 SusWrite 121 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 0.4 15% 7.33 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 11.5 10% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 432%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD M393B2G70DB0-CMA Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70EB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70... 192GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	101% Outstanding	MC Read 51.2 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 38.6 118% 41.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.6 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]- Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 46%

Yacht

System: IBM System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]-

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v21stBench 68%, 827 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K6000Nvidia $4,000Bench 44%, 1,173 samples	1x

SSD
ServeRAID M5110e 3TBIBMBench 235%, 2 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD M393B2G70DB0-CMA Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70EB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70... 192GBSamsungBench 96%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $4,000

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16