Lenovo 10A8S0CE11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10A8S0CE11  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory13.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 15:49
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 188
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 374
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3097) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.2
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 19 23 23 15 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 78.2
Write 4.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 18.5
20% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 69%
WD FILEIO 2TB
19GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 67 67 75 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 39%
Sabrent Disk Device 2TB
378GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.11% Terrible
Read 35.8
Write 38
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 0.4
34% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 123%
Sabrent Disk Device 320GB
35GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 34 32 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 37.5
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 31.6
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 42%
Sabrent Disk Device 500GB
51GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.69% Terrible
Read 37.7
Write 15.3
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 1.8
24% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 140%
Sabrent Disk Device 500GB
67GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.7 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 35.8
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 4.3
34% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 140%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.1
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A8S0CE11 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A8S0CE11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback