Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 10:09
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 214
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 779
70% 592 Pts
64-Core 1,513
94% 1,513 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 177
Parallax 187
151% 183 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 139
Splatting 117
119% 150 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
53GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 237 263 257 216 213 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 434
Mixed 431
SusWrite 250
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 42.6
146% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 184
152% 227 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1635 1052 1606 1533 1505 1532 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 1,519
Mixed 1,535
SusWrite 1,477
366% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 47.5
189% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 881
DQ Write 80.1
DQ Mixed 171
203% 377 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 249%
Great: 519%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1157 1082 978 857 829 783 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,980
Write 1,279
Mixed 879
SusWrite 948
283% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 40
147% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 840
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 142
186% 359 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 203%
Great: 393%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
32GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 119 141 139 137 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 48.2
Write 99.2
Mixed 77
SusWrite 134
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 90%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 125 120 122 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 172
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 121
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 14.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 10.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,132
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback