MSI H81M-E35 V2 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-E35 V2 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150330
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '17 at 13:54
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 378
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 36.2
31% 34.9 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 34.2
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0007 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 346
Write 70.8
Mixed 118
38% 178 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 3.66
52% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 70.9
DQ Mixed 3.62
38% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 53%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
389GB free
Firmware: ML6OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 116
Write 117
Mixed 116
88% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.32
90% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E35 V2 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E35 V2 (MS-7817)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback