Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55 315 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Memory 27.5 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 24.6 17% 24.7 Pts	4-Core 24.1 8-Core 42.9 4% 33.5 Pts	64-Core 38.5 2% 38.5 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 487 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1562) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.52% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.37 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.7 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.52% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723216L9A360 160GB-$69 659 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: FC2OC60D SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 22 28 25 38 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 48.7 Write 47.8 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 25 27% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 4 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 270 15% 270 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-55AMDBench 28%, 315 samples	1x
Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60AMD $28Bench 33%, 1,111 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2600ATIBench 1%, 487 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $100