Lenovo C225

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive10.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo C225  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Inagua CRB
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '22 at 09:34
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 10.7
2-Core 18.8
7% 14.8 Pts
4-Core 21.5
8-Core 24.7
3% 23.1 Pts
64-Core 20.4
1% 20.4 Pts
Poor: 13% Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Legend(17AA 3629) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tammuz SSD 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 105 100 77 53 34 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.3% Very poor
Read 74.5
Write 86.6
Mixed 86
SusWrite 67.7
18% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 2.6
10% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 72%
Spectra Flash 500GB
360GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 23 19 19 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 19.2
Mixed 15.1
SusWrite 20.6
25% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
13% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.32% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 0.6
MC Mixed 1.6
3% 1.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.37 GB/s
Latency 508
8% 508 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback