Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HQ 33,920 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 170 62% 108 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 382 42% 329 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 644GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 348 337 342 338 350 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 391 Write 352 Mixed 322 SusWrite 344 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 32 102% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 292 220% 296 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 859B CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 32GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.2% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 10.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6820HQIntelBench 60%, 33,920 samples	31x

GPU
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples	18x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	13x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	3x
THNSFJ256GDNU A 256GBToshibaBench 73%, 985 samples	3x
SD8TN8U256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 72%, 1,739 samples	2x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	7x
9905700-076.A00G Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 9905700-076.A00G 32GBKingstonBench 41%, 3 samples	3x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2133 32GBHynixBench 30%, 3 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16