Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory36.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 19:01
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 228
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 712
69% 569 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 173
Parallax 179
150% 179 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 160 100 96 84 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 438
Write 366
Mixed 344
SusWrite 157
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 42.5
140% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 248
214% 316 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
21GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 424
Mixed 376
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 41.8
140% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 226
206% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
85GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 370 307 279 253 239 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 432
Mixed 355
SusWrite 309
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 45.1
146% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 166 169 170 151 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 140
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 163
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 38.7
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 20.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback