Acer ICONIA W510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer ICONIA W510  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ICONIA W510
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '17 at 09:12
Run Duration3884 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z2760
U2H1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Memory 26.4
1-Core 7.7
2-Core 14.2
12% 16.1 Pts
4-Core 21.3
8-Core 24.9
3% 23.1 Pts
64-Core 22
1% 22 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator
Acer(1025 074B)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.14.3.1176
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.44
1% 0.63 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Generic SL16G SD Card 16GB
11GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 15.3
Mixed 17
14% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.17
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 1.77
458% 3.14 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 24%
Samsung MBG4GA 31GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.6
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 61.9
Write 9.62
Mixed 32.3
26% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.07
19% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung JM800QSU-2G 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
7.72% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 277
14% 277 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.72%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback