Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '17 at 15:28
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 134 62% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 431 40% 335 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3233) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.5% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 108 Parallax 98.2 86% 104 fps	MRender 88.3 Gravity 91.2 Splatting 76 69% 85.2 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300 9,430 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.8.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 97805116 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 -82076825014566 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1713 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 446 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 50 21478113317 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 97805116 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 97805116 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 97805116 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 30064771073 (E9) Unknown 0 0 27370 (EA) Unknown 0 0 24730 (F1) Unknown 0 0 24730 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23548	50.3% Above average	Read 340 Write 188 Mixed 257 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 10.5 61% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 9.18 50% 113 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 89%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145 6,517 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 453GB free Firmware: 3.AFE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 95 228496137 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 78 78 23505 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 4827215406 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 28040 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5671 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 37 522125343 (C2) HDA temperature 31 63 38654705695 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 52 156288191 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	40.1% Average	Read 69.4 Write 70.4 Mixed 68.3 52% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.41 93% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 4,068 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 445GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 108 Write 107 Mixed 98.8 134% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.2 68% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB 9,885 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.2% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 14.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 13.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16