Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T7400 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0RW199
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110523
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '17 at 18:24
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5450 826 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 86.1 41% 64.8 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 325 29% 246 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.61 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 8.85 Parallax 6.28 6% 7.51 fps	MRender 9.52 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 8.52 7% 8.62 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 157GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9812 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 41 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4163352596	57.2% Above average	Read 259 Write 207 Mixed 141 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 24.5 96% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 63.3 DQ Mixed 42.6 49% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1836 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 15 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 61 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 757611299	60.3% Good	Read 259 Write 208 Mixed 154 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 28.3 103% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 92 DQ Mixed 52.3 58% 99 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 696 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4TB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 32.6 Write 25.5 Mixed 4.68 23% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.31 4K Write 3.76 4K Mixed 0.61 154% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x2GB 8,850 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20% Poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 8.4 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54721stBench 48%, 256 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54401stBench 46%, 452 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX500 500GBCrucial $39Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	49x
8x2GBUnknownBench 114%, 8,850 samples	18x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16