Asus ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX434FLC
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display504 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '23 at 00:55
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Memory 35.4
1-Core 5.5
2-Core 10.4
14% 17.1 Pts
4-Core 22.4
8-Core 28.8
3% 25.6 Pts
64-Core 22.1
1% 22.1 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 150F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 1.3
1% 6.3 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA1T0TCK 1TB
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 46 44 44 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.4% Poor
Read 43.4
Write 47
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 43.8
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.2
378% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 25%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14
Write 12.7
Mixed 12
16% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304ED-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 3.2
13% 4.53 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.6
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 46 60 14" 1280 720 AUO323D
Typical ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook UX434FLC_UX434FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback