Bosgame Basic U32

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBosgame Basic U32  (all builds)
MotherboardBOSGAME Basic U32
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 04:29
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 82
2-Core 167
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 204
32% 228 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 8.1
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.6
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
904GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,949
Write 1,564
Mixed 1,848
398% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 62.3
215% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 658
496% 672 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
32GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 46.3
Mixed 46.3
80% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH26D408SWA-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 GWD0156 ARZOPA
Typical Basic U32 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Bosgame Basic U32

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback