TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 886C
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 05:00
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$234
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 53.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 278
83% 160 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 899
86% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,305
81% 1,305 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 75.3%
 Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
177% Outstanding
Lighting 250
Reflection 230
Parallax 308
203% 263 fps
MRender 292
Gravity 227
Splatting 172
182% 231 fps
Poor: 163% ↑
This bench: 177%
 Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 337 399 424 433 429 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 386
Mixed 328
SusWrite 388
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 33.9
122% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 277
223% 316 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 93.4%
 Great: 137%
SHGP31-1000GM 1TB
572GB free
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1777 1584 1379 1370 1423 1406 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,375
Write 2,164
Mixed 1,549
SusWrite 1,490
425% 1,895 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 74.1
254% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,505
DQ Write 1273
DQ Mixed 1,312
1,004% 1,363 MB/s
Poor: 173% ↑
This bench: 326%
 Great: 433%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 24
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 20.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 71.3%
 Great: 117%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 50 240 24.5" 1280 720 DELA1C2 DELL S2522HG
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx Builds (Compare 4,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-1xxx

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples1,339x
Core i7-11700KIntel  $234Bench 101%, 65,651 samples1,118x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD  $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples638x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1,208x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples880x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples657x
SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TBWDCBench 191%, 10,094 samples1,596x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TBWDCBench 236%, 4,202 samples1,436x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 210%, 3,022 samples429x
RAM
HP37D4U1S8ME-8XR 2x8GBKingstonBench 90%, 6,088 samples1,503x
HP37D4U1S8ME-16XR 2x16GBKingstonBench 98%, 2,425 samples937x
HP37D4U1S8MR-8XR 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 3,921 samples372x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback