Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171102
Uptime9 Days
Run DateDec 30 '17 at 20:34
Run Duration62 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 115
49% 81 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 184
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 51%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 1,273
Write 304
Mixed 305
135% 627 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 9.92
68% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 40.5
DQ Mixed 38.7
28% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 144%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.2% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8.8
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $230
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback