Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 120 54% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 276 29% 232 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M 2,951 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Toshiba(1179 FB18) 3GB CLim: 597 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 377.19 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Lighting 12.2 Reflection 14.6 Parallax 11.2 10% 12.6 fps	MRender 16.5 Gravity 12.8 Splatting 12.5 11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB 10,566 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 5 (03) Spinup time 188 186 1575 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4948 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7627 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 98 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3305 (BB) vendor-specific 100 97 3 (BC) Unknown 100 99 17180131339 (BE) vendor-specific 65 32 35 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 440 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 119 119 243999 (C2) HDA temperature 112 79 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	22.4% Poor	Read 39.5 Write 38.6 Mixed 40.1 30% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.18 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.05 19% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 32%
SanDisk Dual Drive 32GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID 559e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Read 24.3 Write 8.74 Mixed 13.2 17% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.02 4% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GB 2,461 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 11.4 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	22x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	22x
GTX 780MNvidiaBench 23%, 3,739 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	3x
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	2x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	2x

RAM
TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE 3x4GBKingstonBench 40%, 67 samples	6x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 136 samples	5x
TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 624 samples	3x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $542

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16