TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-1585

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Katana 15 B13VFK
MotherboardMSI MS-1585  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230627
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '24 at 15:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 62.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 220
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 481
54% 421 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 94% ↑
This bench: 64.2%
 Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13C7) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 14.7
10% 14.7 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 17
Splatting 13.7
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 10.6%
 Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1032 1TB
475GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74104000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 900 1122 999 1529 1474 1477 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,245
Write 1,824
Mixed 1,468
SusWrite 1,250
380% 1,697 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 58.1
206% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 430
323% 441 MB/s
Poor: 250% ↑
This bench: 250%
 Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
120% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 46.1
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 106% ↑
This bench: 120%
 Great: 146%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0A2
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-1585 Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-1585

CPU
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples696x
Core i7-13620HIntelBench 103%, 3,136 samples405x
Core i7-13700HIntelBench 104%, 4,359 samples160x
GPU
RTX 4070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 132%, 10,174 samples442x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples337x
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples314x
SSD
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TBNvmeBench 258%, 5,218 samples267x
SAMSUNG MZVL41T0HBLB-00BTW 1TBNvmeBench 317%, 652 samples252x
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TBBench 256%, 2,000 samples201x
RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples389x
M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GBSamsungBench 130%, 5,024 samples211x
HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GBHynixBench 129%, 4,442 samples180x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback