Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '18 at 12:55
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$194
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 329
38% 294 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Gigabyte(1458 21E0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2001.0
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 3.16
3% 3.03 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.5% Average
Read 245
Write 38.1
Mixed 201
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 13.5
78% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 66.7
DQ Mixed 40.4
52% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 92%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
447GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 119
Write 109
Mixed 108
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.21
92% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 83%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
469GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 96.4
Mixed 80.8
66% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.35
79% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
164GB free
Firmware: CC4H
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75% Very good
Read 140
Write 122
Mixed 130
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.31
87% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix MPPU4GB16008Chips 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $191
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback