Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C650D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite C650D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 00:01
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD V120
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 92
1-Core 33.5
2-Core 32.3
42% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 33.1
8-Core 32.8
4% 32.9 Pts
64-Core 33.5
2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Toshiba(1179 FDE4) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.68 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST940210AS 40GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ALC Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 33.7
Write 36
Mixed 15.3
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.29
53% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C650D Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C650D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback