Asrock 880GM-LE FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 880GM-LE FX  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '18 at 08:48
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 77.9
44% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 75.5
8-Core 77.5
10% 76.5 Pts
64-Core 84.5
5% 84.5 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5600
PwrHis(1787 2300) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.0.0
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 8.94
5% 7.52 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 8.17
Splatting 7.61
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 75
Write 67.4
Mixed 36.8
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.45
90% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$30
88GB free
Firmware: PBBOC60N Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 39.3
Mixed 13.6
25% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26%
Great: 34%
SRT USB 3.0 JET 32G 32GB
16GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.61% Terrible
Read 27
Write 8.08
Mixed 15.4
18% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.94
4K Write 0.73
4K Mixed 0.57
55% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.61%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-002.A00G 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.3
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 880GM-LE FX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GM-LE FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $285
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback