Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120110
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '18 at 04:47
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50% Average	Memory 83.4 1-Core 41.4 2-Core 70.2 45% 65 Pts	4-Core 98.2 8-Core 109 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Lighting 47.2 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 39.5 38% 39.7 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 43.3 Splatting 38.4 33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 57GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 36836 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 113 (B1) Unknown 98 98 42 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 54 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 37 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15384684017	62.5% Good	Read 267 Write 258 Mixed 264 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 24.9 102% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 60.8 62% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 38364 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 149 (B1) Unknown 86 86 491 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 51 51 49297 (EB) Unknown 99 99 86 (F1) Unknown 99 99 55158728992	61.3% Good	Read 267 Write 257 Mixed 264 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 23 99% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 59.7 60% 96 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 110%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70 4,260 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01K01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 166 10458 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14767 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 41 41 43398 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 482 (B7) Unknown 68 68 32 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 397 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14369 (C2) HDA temperature 116 106 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	85.2% Excellent	Read 153 Write 144 Mixed 131 107% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 3.26 4K Mixed 0.54 152% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 10.4 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	210x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	48x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	33x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	65x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16