Novatech PC-X007876

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Novatech PC-X007876 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '18 at 16:35
Run Duration	365 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 88.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 241 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 870 83% 687 Pts	64-Core 1,109 69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.3% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 112 Parallax 94.6 84% 103 fps	MRender 96.9 Gravity 94.1 Splatting 99.6 80% 96.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,901 Write 1,149 Mixed 1,157 310% 1,402 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 31.5 161% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 464 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 163 188% 325 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 236%
G-raid with Thunderbolt 12TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 6TB free Firmware: 0 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 310 Write 283 Mixed 224 203% 272 MB/s	4K Read 2.17 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.65 207% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 207%
Hitachi G-DRIVE with Thu 8TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 144 Write 148 Mixed 128 105% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 3.01 4K Mixed 0.31 119% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 111%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 180 7758 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6995 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 15223 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 210 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 69 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 15672 (C2) HDA temperature 118 104 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 195 8031 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71.4% Very good	Read 142 Write 108 Mixed 92.5 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.16 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.18 40% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 59GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 174 170 2291 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3541 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20880 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 398 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 171 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3542 (C2) HDA temperature 112 97 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.5% Good	Read 96.5 Write 142 Mixed 122 91% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.27 89% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3300831AS 300GB 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 45GB free Firmware: 3.02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 59 51 73240770 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 14128 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 320060878 (09) Power-on hours count 12 12 77628 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1713 (C2) HDA temperature 37 52 42949672997 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 51 73240770 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	25.8% Poor	Read 42.1 Write 47.8 Mixed 53.7 36% 47.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.29 66% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 37%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3TB free, PID 8016 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 138 Write 154 Mixed 27 127% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.19 73% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 65%
External RAID 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 898GB free, PID ce31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 41.2 Write 42.1 Mixed 15.1 40% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.37 66% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 20%
Ext Hard Disk 1TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 428GB free, PID ce33 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 41.8 Write 41.9 Mixed 16.9 41% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.41 64% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 21%
ST310005 20AS 1TB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 83GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 40 Write 41.6 Mixed 26.5 45% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.26 44% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 13,232 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.9% Above average	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 18 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 20.7 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Novatech PC-X007876

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)